Emmanuel L. Sabado
Emmanuel L. Sabado 
The excommunication is null and void according to canon 1382 of the Canon Law. Null and void = excommunication does not exist. Do I need any further proof?

The Splendor of the Church

[The excommunication is null and void according to canon 1382 of the Canon Law. Null and void = excommunication does not exist.]

LET US READ THE CANON #1382 OF THE CODE OF CANON LAW TO SEE IF LEFEBVRE’S EXCOMMUNICATION IS NULL AND VOID:

Can. 1382 A bishop who consecrates some one a bishop without a pontifical mandate and the person who receives the consecration from him incur a latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See. [CODE OF CANON LAW 1983]

NOTHING IN CANON 1382 SAYS THAT THE EXCOMMUNICATION OF LEFEBVRE IS NULL AND VOID. INSTEAD, IT PROVES THAT THE EXCOMMUNICATION OF LEFEBVRE IS TRULY VALID BECAUSE LEFEBVRE CONSECRATED FOUR BISHOPS WITHOUT PONTIFICAL MANDATE. SO LEFEBVRE WAS EXCOMMUNICATED LATAE SENTENTIAE.

THE EXCOMMUNICATION OF LEFEBVRE IS RESERVED TO THE HOLY SEE. IT MEANS ONLY THE POPE CAN REMOVE IT. SO FAR NO POPE HAS EVER REMOVE IT. HE DIED EXCOMMUNICATED AND REMAINS EXCOMMUNICATED UNTIL NOW. IT’S A PITY BUT THAT IS THE FACT. WE DON’T WANT LEFEBVRE TO BE EXCOMMUNICATED BUT HE WAS THE ONE WHO VIOLATED THE CODE OF CANON LAW WHOSE PROVISION IS VERY CLEAR.

EVEN IN 1917 CODE OF CANON LAW WHAT LEFEBVRE DID SUCH AS ORDAINING BISHOPS WITHOUT PONTIFICAL MANDATE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED:

CANON #953 The consecration of a Bishop is reserved to the Roman Pontiff so that it is not permitted to any Bishop to consecrate another as Bishop without first having gotten a pontifical mandate. [1917 CODE OF CANON LAW]

THE LAW OF THE CHURCH IS CLEAR. THE VIOLATION OF LEFEBVRE IS CLEAR. HE SIMPLY EARNED THE EFFECT OF HIS OWN ACTION. NO ONE TO BLAME THERE BUT HIMSELF. LEFEBVRE SHOULD HAVE LISTENED TO THE CATECHISM OF ST. PIUS X, THE 1917 CODE OF CANON LAW AS WELL AS THE 1983 CODE OF CANON LAW. HE SHOULD HAVE TAKEN INTO HEART THE CALL TO OBEDIENCE TO THE POPE ISSUED BY DOGMATIC CONSTITUTION OF VATICAN I.

[Do I need any further proof?]

YES. YOU NEED FURTHER PROOF BECAUSE YOU HAVE BEEN FOUND NOT HONEST IN YOUR PRESENTATION OF ALLEGED PROOF. READ CANON #1382 OF THE CODE OF CANON LAW AND REFLECT ON IT.